coMra Wave Research Summary

The coMra Wave technology is a patented and scientifically tested approach to utilise background electromagnetic radiation or electrosmog to provide two beneficial functions. The first is to offer a degree of radiation protection from high frequency cellular and wireless radiation, and the second is to use the absorbed radiation for the improvement of the quality and freshness of water, and the consequent benefits to the health and vitality of the human body through the medium of water.
Radiation protection measurements on cellular phones with and without the coMra Wave technology, show that the coMra Wave technology provides radiation protection with on average, tested across many cell phones, a 25% reduction in the transmitted wireless radiation. Protection results vary depending on the make and model of the phone between 15% and 50%, and in all cases did not interfere with the correct operation of the cellular or wireless product.
The coMra Wave technology performs a DUAL function.

The radiation that is absorbed from wireless products is then used as a power source to re-process the received energy into a signature and pattern that can be used in the natural re-arrangement of the structure of water.
Microwave signature measurements show that the transmission response of the coMra Wave technology has a similar signature to that of water. Exposing water to this signature is shown to induce a subtle re-arrangement to the structure of the bulk-body of the water.
Energised or Activated water has a smaller cluster size, with a fine structure and higher stored energy, and more available oxygen. The water is activated through using the energy and oxygen availability already present in the water. Activation results in the re-structuring of the water dynamics through the imprinted message in order to re-generate the bulk body of the water closer to its natural state.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance is a powerful technique that can provide detailed information on the topology, dynamics and three-dimensional structure of molecules in solution.

The coMra Wave technology when tested on water samples using the NMR O17 isotope shows a clear, repeatable, and sustained reduction in the water cluster size, suggesting that the water has been imprinted with a transformation towards that of natural water.
Natural water is characterised by a balanced level of dissolved oxygen, whereas water that is stagnant, isolated, or cleaned and purified by man-made methods, is often characterised by lower dissolved oxygen content.
The coMra Wave technology when tested on water samples using dissolved oxygen tests show a clear, repeatable, and sustained re-balance of the available dissolved oxygen, suggesting that the water has been imprinted with a transformation towards that of natural water.
The presented research pages were provided to introduce the coMra Wave technology dual function of radiation protection and energising water, and the experiments and measurements that provide the basis of the coMra Wave Products.

REFERENCES

1. Röösli, Martin (June 2008). “Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review”. Environmental Research 107 (2): 277-287.
2. Frei, Patrizia; Mohler, Evelyn; Neubauer, Georg; Theis, Gaston; Bürgi, Alfred; Fröhlich, Jürg; Braun-Fahrländer, Charlotte; Bolte, John et al. (August 2009). “Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields”. Environmental Research 109 (6): 779-785.
3. Foster, Kenneth R (March 2007). “Radiofrequency exposure from wireless LANs utilizing Wi-Fi technology”. Health Physics 92 (3): 280-289.
4. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K (March 2009). “Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases”. Pathophysiology 16 (2-3): 113-22.
5. Huber, R; Treyer V; Borbély AA; Schuderer J; Gottselig JM; Landolt HP; Werth E; Berthold T; Kuster N; Buck A; Achermann P (December 2002). “Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG”. Journal of sleep research (Wiley-Liss, Inc) 11 (4): 289-95.
6. Kramarenko, AV; Tan U (July 2003). “Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: a brain mapping study”. The International journal of neuroscience (Taylor and Francis) 113 (7): 1007-19.
7. Lönn, Stefan; Ahlbom, Anders; Hall, Per; Feychting, Maria; Swedish Interphone Study Group (2005). “Long-Term Mobile Phone Use and Brain Tumor Risk”. American Journal of Epidemiology 161 (6): 526-35.

8. Borbély, AA; Huber R; Graf T; Fuchs B; Gallmann E; Achermann P (1999-11-19). “Pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field affects human sleep and sleep electroencephalogram”. Neuroscience Letters (East Park : Elsevier Science Ireland) 275 (3): 207-10.
9. Krause, CM; Pesonen M; Haarala Björnberg C; Hämäläinen H (May 2007). “Effects of pulsed and continuous wave 902 MHz mobile phone exposure on brain oscillatory activity during cognitive processing”. Bioelectromagnetics (Wiley-Liss, Inc) 28 (4): 296-308.
10. Krause, CM; Björnberg CH; Pesonen M; Hulten A; Liesivuori T; Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Laine M; Hämäläinen H (June 2006). “Mobile phone effects on children’s event-related oscillatory EEG during an auditory memory task”. International journal of radiation biology (Taylor and Francis) 82 (6): 443-50.
11. “Conclusions on mobile phones and radio frequency fields”. European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (2008).
12. Wilen, J; A Johansson, N Kalezic, E Lyskov, M Sandstrom (April 2006). “Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms”. Bioelectromagnetics 27 (3): 204-14.
13. Rubin GJ, Cleare AJ, Wessely S (January 2008). “Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones”. J Psychosom Res 64 (1): 1-9; discussion 11-2.
14. Landgrebe M, Hauser S, Langguth B, Frick U, Hajak G, Eichhammer P (March 2007). “Altered cortical excitability in subjectively electrosensitive patients: results of a pilot study”. J Psychosom Res 62 (3): 283-8.